Top State Directories

  • New Jersey Nursing Homes
  • Pennsylvania Nursing Homes
  • New York Nursing Homes
  • Florida Nursing Homes
  • Texas Nursing Homes
  • California Nursing Homes

More State Directories

  • Ohio Nursing Homes
  • Illinois Nursing Homes
  • Massachusetts Nursing Homes
  • Delaware Nursing Homes
  • Connecticut Nursing Homes
  • Maryland Nursing Homes

Popular City Markets

  • SNFs in Edison, NJ
  • SNFs in Philadelphia, PA
  • SNFs in Newark, NJ
  • SNFs in New York, NY
  • SNFs in Miami, FL
  • SNFs in Chicago, IL

More City Markets

  • SNFs in Pittsburgh, PA
  • SNFs in Trenton, NJ
  • SNFs in Houston, TX
  • SNFs in Cleveland, OH
  • SNFs in Boston, MA
  • SNFs in Wilmington, DE
Ownership & Enforcement TransparencyNJ Accountability ReportPA Accountability ReportNY Accountability ReportFL Accountability ReportSuggest a feature →

No sponsored placements. No referral fees. How we score →

Rankings are based on CMS Provider Data only. Placet receives no compensation from facilities. Data may be delayed — verify current details directly with each facility before acting.

Terms
Placet
Care HubSearchResourcesFamily GuidesTransparencyBuild logAbout

How we work

Methodology

Every score, badge, and notice on Placet reflects a deliberate choice about data sourcing and transparency. This section explains how we classify facilities, where our data comes from, and — critically — what we cannot tell you.

Transparency modes

Every facility on Placet is assigned one of four transparency modes, shown as a badge on the facility profile. The mode tells you what kind of oversight the facility operates under and how much public data is available.

Federal oversight

What CMS publishes on nursing homes

Medicare- and Medicaid-certified Skilled Nursing Facilities (SNFs) report to the federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. CMS publishes inspection results, deficiency citations, staffing hours via Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ), civil monetary penalties, and quality measures. This is the most complete public data set available for any care setting.

Dual-status campus

Campuses that mix federal and state oversight

Some facilities include both a federally-certified SNF and a state-regulated long-term care setting — such as an Assisted Living Facility or CCRC — under the same operator and address. We call these dual-status campuses because federal oversight discipline and operator accountability can extend across the whole campus, even though only the SNF portion has public CMS data.

State regulated

Facilities regulated by state, not CMS

Assisted Living Facilities, Residential Care Homes, and most Memory Care communities are licensed at the state level. They do not report to CMS and are not included in Care Compare. How much public data exists depends on each state's disclosure laws — some states publish inspection reports and complaint histories; others publish almost nothing.

Data desert

States and facility types where public data is missing

In some states, reliable inspection or quality data is simply not publicly available for non-SNF care settings. Rather than present a misleadingly thin profile, we show an explicit notice and direct families to the state ombudsman, in-person visits, and other resources. We believe saying "we don't know" is more honest than showing silence.

Reference

Data availability by state

A state-by-state breakdown of which facility types are covered, what public data exists, and where the gaps are.

CCRC financial health

Why entrance fees are at risk in Continuing Care Retirement Communities, how we score liquidity and coverage ratios, and what families should ask before signing a contract.

Our data principles

  • —We show what we know, and flag what we don’t. If data is missing, unavailable, or unreliable, we say so explicitly rather than hiding the gap.
  • —We don’t manufacture scores. Our Trust Index and quality pillars are derived from public CMS data. We do not apply proprietary ratings to state-regulated facilities where the underlying data doesn’t support it.
  • —We distinguish between data type and data quality. A facility with a thin profile is not being penalized — it may simply operate in a state with limited public disclosure. We try to make that distinction visible.
  • —Operator accountability crosses campus lines. When the same company runs both a federally-certified SNF and a nearby ALF, we treat the SNF’s federal record as relevant context — even for the non-SNF building.
← Back to Transparency